counter customizable free hit
About This Website

This blog is intended to showcase my pictures or those of other photographers who have moved beyond the pretty picture and for whom photography is more than entertainment - photography that aims at being true, not at being beautiful because what is true is most often beautiful..

>>>> Comments, commentary and lively discussions, re: my writings or any topic germane to the medium and its apparatus, are vigorously encouraged.

Search this site
Recent Topics
Journal Categories
Archives by Month
Subscribe
listed

Photography Directory by PhotoLinks

Powered by Squarespace
Login
« ku # 689 ~ its all good, pt. ll | Main | ku # 684-687 ~ truth or consequences »
Friday
Mar192010

ku # 688 ~ its all good

1044757-6200992-thumbnail.jpg
Vernal water and submerged ice • click to embiggen
Relative to yesterday's entry and pictures that lie or tell the truth, Martin Doonan stated:

I have just as much problem with those out to make things appear worse than they are (and much news coverage seems to be going that way) as the pretty picture, saturation to 11.

As far as I'm concerned, a picture that deceives or misrepresents is a lie. Period. How big/harmful a lie it is is another topic.

However, what often bothers me when the idea of telling the truth, picture-making wise, comes up is the notion that the opposite of pretty landscape / nature pictures is ugly landscape / nature pictures. The idea that to avoid pretty, one must seek out ugly is, IMO, completely off the mark.

Pretty and ugly may be at opposite ends of the spectrum but, IMO, there's a whole lot of gradation in between. The inability to see or discover the many shades of that gradation can quite simply be chalked up to lack of imagination coupled with cultural bias.

Reader Comments (2)

From where I'm sitting (a very dry South Australia) this image is very serene and welcome.

The ice below the water makes the surface of water appear as if it was painted. I'm sure you're not using some kind of "Art" filter ;-).

March 21, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterSven W

Sven - you're right on the money, no "art" filters were used in the making of this picture (or any other picture I've ever made).

that said, the reflection of the sky was on just water, no ice. The submerged ice is yellowish/greenish formation at the top of the picture.

March 21, 2010 | Unregistered Commentergravitas et nugalis

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>