counter customizable free hit
About This Website

This blog is intended to showcase my pictures or those of other photographers who have moved beyond the pretty picture and for whom photography is more than entertainment - photography that aims at being true, not at being beautiful because what is true is most often beautiful..

>>>> Comments, commentary and lively discussions, re: my writings or any topic germane to the medium and its apparatus, are vigorously encouraged.

Search this site
Recent Topics
Journal Categories
Archives by Month
Subscribe
listed

Photography Directory by PhotoLinks

Powered by Squarespace
Login
« man & nature # 66 ~ learning curve, pt. 2 | Main | man & nature # 64 ~ all together now »
Saturday
Oct252008

man & nature # 65 ~ a new learning curve

gasolinedocksm.jpg1044757-2063444-thumbnail.jpg
Gasoline and Motor Oilclick to embiggen
I've been messing around with making some BW prints from some of my files. The BWs are "conversions" from color files - is there any other way of picturing in BW in the digital age? If you shoot RAW, I don't think that there is.

Nevertheless, what I am discovering in the process of making "conversions" is that there are plenty of interesting options available when using the Calculations dialog box. It seems possible to achieve results that resemble those created with conventional BW film methods - things like shooting with a red filter to get dramatic dark skies and so on. In fact, like so much in the digital darkroom, it possible to get much more "fine-tuned" results - the equivalent of shooting with BW film and having lots and lots of filters in your bag.

But, of course, the "magic" of it all is that this can all be done after the fact of picturing. And, there are sooo many possibilities that it makes Adams' Zone System since like an very limited and very antiquated process from the 1940s. Oh, wait ... it is from the 1940s.

Reader Comments (5)

I'll be interested to where this leads; color seems so integral to your photographs. I'm curious why you're using calculations rather than the 'Black and White' adjustment which seem more flexible to me and has the advantage of working as an adjustment layer. Do Calculations offer an advantage I'm not aware of?

October 26, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterMark M

Mark,
calculation as well apply image give you a large choice of channel manipulation like substituting the red one with the green one if this better fits your aim. Oh by the way it works nice for colors too. A bare example is to apply image of the red channel to a duplicated layer of the background in darken mode and then put the layer in luminosity mode: this is for RGB color mode.
The interesting thing is that each photoshop color mode single channel gives you a nice set of filters.

I could not resist. Did not want to stole the Word from the Master :-D I apologize.

However I always suspected that the Master was quite able in digital darkroom manipulations, the best ones are the ones you did not notice.

October 26, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterMauro

Mark, you must be a mind reader. I was going to email you on your thoughts on this. My question is this, my wifes Nikon D40 shoots B&W and I was wondering do most people make color images and convert them or do they use the B&W setting (if availabe) on their camera?

October 26, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterDon

Thanks Mauro, I understand how the calculations work--I've used it when working with 7-channel landsat images-- but I am curious why someone would choose it over the Black and White adjustment (which lets you mix channels in a fairly intuitive manner) or even the channel mixer which lets you set percentages of each channel.

October 26, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterMark M

Mark you can find some explanations (certainly better than mine) in "Dan Margulis" professional photoshop which has a chapeter on bw conversion using those methods. Channel surgery, for how i see it, is one of the only ways to add new information in a digital image.

October 27, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterMauro

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>