counter customizable free hit
About This Website

This blog is intended to showcase my pictures or those of other photographers who have moved beyond the pretty picture and for whom photography is more than entertainment - photography that aims at being true, not at being beautiful because what is true is most often beautiful..

>>>> Comments, commentary and lively discussions, re: my writings or any topic germane to the medium and its apparatus, are vigorously encouraged.

Search this site
Recent Topics
Journal Categories
Archives by Month
Subscribe
listed

Photography Directory by PhotoLinks

Powered by Squarespace
Login
« diptych (selection) # 14-16 ~ much to do about nothing (?) | Main | decay & disgust # 50 / civilized ku # 2827-43 / ku # 1294 ~ the photographer's job / 10-14 days worth »
Thursday
Nov202014

diptych (selection) # 8-13 ~ fabricating camera angles

1044757-25690267-thumbnail.jpg
bridge and bramble ~ Plattsburgh, NY • click to embiggen
1044757-25690269-thumbnail.jpg
late Autumn color ~ Lake Placid, NY - in the Adirondack PARK • click to embiggen
1044757-25690701-thumbnail.jpg
Vermont view ~ Lewis, NY - in the Adirondack PARK • click to embiggen
1044757-25690695-thumbnail.jpg
steeple ~ Pittsford, NY • click to embiggen
1044757-25690697-thumbnail.jpg
shed / vine ~ Whalenberg, NY - in the Adirondack PARK • click to embiggen
1044757-25690289-thumbnail.jpg
motorcycle / house ~ Glens Falls, NY • click to embiggen

There is a lot of talk about camera angles; but the only valid angles in existence are the angles of the geometry of composition and not the ones fabricated by the photographer who falls flat on his stomach or performs other antics to procure his effects. - Henri Cartier-Bresson

I am continuing along the merry road of my diptych (selection)* project, which is essentially a multiple choice exercise in the "... recognition, in real life, of a rhythm of surfaces, lines, and values" (Henri Cartier-Bresson) - as is all of my picture making. That written, as I make my multiple choice selections, I am also holding true to my continuing picture making habit of not fabricating angles by means of physical gymnastics.

That is to write, 92.5-94.9% of all of my picture making has been performed by lifting a camera to my eye while standing fully upright.

The primary reason for that habit is really quite simple - I picture what I see and, for the most part, I see, picture making wise, standing upright. The other 5.1-7.5% of the time, picture making wise, I make pictures at eye level, albeit that that level might be while sitting or horizontally reclining.

In any event, it is safe and accurate to write that, when a referent pricks my eye and sensibilities, I picture it in the exact same body posture I was in when I first noticed it.

*FYI For those who haven't read it, the work-in-progress Artist Statement is HERE

Reader Comments (1)

>>I picture what I see and, for the most part, I see, picture making wise, standing upright... when a referent pricks my eye and sensibilities, I picture it in the exact same body posture I was in when I first noticed it.

So when you "see" the referent, which framing captures your vision? In other words, what is the "equivalent" focal length of your vision? Or do you have "zoom" vision?

And why shoot two focal length framings from the same position when cropping the wider frame would result in the same result?

November 21, 2014 | Unregistered CommenterJohn Linn

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>