counter customizable free hit
About This Website

This blog is intended to showcase my pictures or those of other photographers who have moved beyond the pretty picture and for whom photography is more than entertainment - photography that aims at being true, not at being beautiful because what is true is most often beautiful..

>>>> Comments, commentary and lively discussions, re: my writings or any topic germane to the medium and its apparatus, are vigorously encouraged.

Search this site
Recent Topics
Journal Categories
Archives by Month
Subscribe
listed

Photography Directory by PhotoLinks

Powered by Squarespace
Login
« life without the APA # 9 ~ for me, yet another Warholian 15-minutes-of-fame event | Main | civilized ku # 2447 ~ crammed to the rafters (with complete disclosure) »
Monday
Jan142013

civilized ku # 2448 ~ let there be (balanced) light

Night fog ~ Au Sable Forks, NY - in the Adirondack Park • click to embiggenIMO, night picture making, under some circumstances, is one of the most difficult to proccess, color wise. Those such circumstances are when there are multiple artificial light sources, each with differing white balance points. Multiple color balances, if left uncorrected (individually), tend to result in a somewhat garish potpourri of disjointed colors in a print of the scene.

My solution to such cases, as in the picture with this entry, is to process the image as many times as there are different color balance sources, correcting each color source to a more correct color balance - in the Night fog picture, there were 3 predominant light sources so I processed the image 3x, one corrected file for each area of the scene dominated by a different light source. Then I merged the separate corrected areas of the picture into one composite file which resulted in a much more real representation of the scene.

Doing so is slightly time consuming but, IMO, the result is well worth the effort.

Reader Comments (5)

Nice detail but still soft, very nice.

January 14, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterDon

Heh. Just came back from walking the dog during which I thought to myself I should make a plan to do some picturing tonight after dark - something I've been meaning to do for a while. Returned and found this post. Good processing suggestion - I'll keep that in mind.

January 14, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterEric Fredine

Good image ... has a certain "crispness" to it ... makes my eye want to explore the different nooks and crannies portrayed.

Yes, I've been paying more attention to colour casts and have recently decided to "up my game" by recognising and correcting for multiple colour casts. I've been using PS layers + masks to handle the different areas / referents in the image.

This is time consuming and I was wondering if I was doing the right thing, but I now realise you go through the same process as well.

How did photographers get it right back in the days of film?

I've mentioned it before, but I appreciate you repeating these technical / aesthetic issues in your posts. Eventually the importance of these ideas sink in and I do something about it in my own images.

January 15, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterSven W

What I like is that each light source looks balanced but still retains the appropriate hint of color expected from that source. The streetlight has a hint of yellow (sodium or incandescent?) the light spilling into the road from the storefront is cooler (florescent perhaps?). The overall effect is it looks correct, but not artificially so.

January 15, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterJohn Linn

I like this technique and I've used something similar in the past before. Since using Lightroom I've been using the Adjustment brush and making local color balance changes using the sliders and brushing where necessary after making an initial color balance change to the entire photo. It takes a bit of practice but it's non-destructive and you can always make a change at any time.

January 15, 2013 | Unregistered Commenterken bello

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>