counter customizable free hit
About This Website

This blog is intended to showcase my pictures or those of other photographers who have moved beyond the pretty picture and for whom photography is more than entertainment - photography that aims at being true, not at being beautiful because what is true is most often beautiful..

>>>> Comments, commentary and lively discussions, re: my writings or any topic germane to the medium and its apparatus, are vigorously encouraged.

Search this site
Recent Topics
Journal Categories
Archives by Month
Subscribe
listed

Photography Directory by PhotoLinks

Powered by Squarespace
Login
« picture windows # 60 ~ it was sunny day | Main | civilized ku # 899 ~ the Spirit of Fact »
Thursday
Mar312011

civilized ku # 900 ~ the mnemonic powers of ordinary snapshots

1044757-11499442-thumbnail.jpg
Early Spring window view ~ Au Sable Forks, NY - in the Adirondack PARK • click to embiggen
On the entry civilized ku # 898, Jeff Lansing wrote:

Apropos of nothing: You have referenced Barthes frequently. Thought you might find this interesting.

Hey, Jeff - thanks for the link. Indeed, I did find it interesting and well worth reading.

True be told, I have long ago lost my copy of Camera Lucida. I haven't re-acquired it simply because so much of it can be accessed online. For all I know, the entire book might even be available online (it was a short book).

But that said, I am always interested in reading about what other readers have to say regarding their reading of the Camera Lucida. Just like I like to read (but am so often disappointed by the lack of response) the opinions of others regarding what I have to say or pass on here on The Landscapist. IMO, the exchange of informed ideas, is how we best learn and grow.

In any event, I have pulled out a few excerpts from the linked article for your consideration and, hoping against hope, your comments (FYI, all quotes are by the article's author unless otherwise attributed).

Roland Barthes declared that "in order to see a photograph well, it is best to look away or close your eyes."

It seems to me, in light of Barthes' ideas about studium and punctum - studium denoting the cultural, linguistic, and political interpretation of a photograph - the manifest subject, meaning and context of the photograph, punctum denoting the wounding / piercing, personally touching detail that holds our gaze without condescending to mere meaning or beauty and which establishes a direct relationship with the object or person within it, looking away or closing your eyes in order to see a photograph well is a technique that directs one's attention away from the visual / obvious and toward an inner connection to any awareness of piercing, wounding, or personally significant affect(s) the picture might hold for the viewer.

This purely subjective response, which demonstrates a "strange air of searching and susceptibility" - and approach that "in academic terms [is/was] quite scandalous", caused art critic Martin Herbert to state, "I don't go looking for 'ideas about photography' in that book; I read it for a certain kind of vulnerability."

The notions of "strange air of searching and susceptibility" and "a certain kind of vulnerability" that come from reading Camera Lucida are directly related to the deeply personal and quite emotionally touching nature of Barthes quest - the idea of connecting to his mother, after her then recent death, via looking at pictures of her. Barthes looked at many pictures in which his mother looked objectively like herself. But it wasn't until, "At last, he discovers her true likeness, the 'air' that he remembers, in a picture of Henriette aged five, taken in a winter garden in 1898 ... In narrative terms, it's an astonishing moment, comparable to the onrush of memories as madeleine meets teacup in Proust, or the scene in Citizen Kane when the maddened Kane first grasps the snow globe, emblem of all he has left behind."

This revelatory experience lead Barthes to believe that "every photograph is ... a memorial; the very essence of the medium is its spectral conjuring of death-in-life." That the "mnemonic powers of ordinary snapshots" are indeed very powerful.

For another look at studium and punctum and the wounding / piercing "mnemonic powers of ordinary snapshots", you should also read this article.

While I don't believe that every photograph is involved in the "spectral conjuring of death-in-life". there is no denying that every photograph is a depiction of what was and in that sense they are, indeed, "memorials".

Reader Comments (1)

I've probably understand only a fraction of Barthes' book (but then, even Mike Johnston has admitted he needed several approaches), but Barthes' explanation of the subjectivity of impact of each image has taught me a great bit of carefulness when it comes to the reaction of other observers of my images. And I've learned to trust more my 'gut feelings'. And I found the 'Camera Lucida' an important opposite point of view to 'On Photography', attributing photography a more positive (and way more complex) functionality than what Sontag had in my opinion left over from it.

April 1, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterMarkus Spring

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>