counter customizable free hit
About This Website

This blog is intended to showcase my pictures or those of other photographers who have moved beyond the pretty picture and for whom photography is more than entertainment - photography that aims at being true, not at being beautiful because what is true is most often beautiful..

>>>> Comments, commentary and lively discussions, re: my writings or any topic germane to the medium and its apparatus, are vigorously encouraged.

Search this site
Recent Topics
Journal Categories
Archives by Month
Subscribe
listed

Photography Directory by PhotoLinks

Powered by Squarespace
Login
« civilized ku # 1190 ~ the art of selection / choosing | Main | civilized ku # 1189 ~ let me hip you to reality .. all ya gotta do is open your mind along with your eyes »
Friday
Nov182011

ku # 1134 ~ wherein Einstein rumimates on the limits of clichéd picture making

1044757-15187096-thumbnail.jpg
Milkweed ~ near Au Sable Forks, NY - in the Adirondack PARK • click to embiggen

Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited to all we now know and understand, while imagination embraces the entire world, and all there ever will be to know and understand. ~ Albert Einstein

IMO, it takes little or no imagination to make pictures of stuff everyone has already made pictures of and already knows about. Conversely, it takes a fair amount of imagination to see the wonder/beauty in stuff that everyone sees but to which very few are paying attention.

Reader Comments (3)

I completely agree with you on this. Anyone looking at sites like 500px will find a mind-numbing number of well-executed photos of the usual suspects (clouds, waterfalls, fields, mountains, and other similar stuff). Beautiful yes, innovative not so much). I believe is was Einstein who postulated to basic formula for this condition:

Cliche + (inverse of innovation) = boring

November 18, 2011 | Unregistered Commenterpepeye

Between photographers, I see another distinction in complexity vs simplicity. Many photographers prefer to have one referent in the frame (which usually devolves to a pretty girl, a car, a mountain, a dog etc) whereas others prefer complexity. The former pictures are easy to read and the latter may require a couple seconds (or more) to interpret.

Of course neither approach is good or bad.

Some photographers want to produce a pleasing image that when displayed, isn't too taxing on the brain. They don't have to explain (or defend) its purpose to other people - it's self-evident.

Other photographers want to see some aspect of Life revealed or even resolved by a photo. They might see their photos as an opportunity for discussion or perhaps only appreciated by a smaller crowd.

Just different ends of the photography spectrum (or more precisely, one axis of the many).

November 18, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterSven W

Well, you're nothing if not amusing, Mark. So Einstein was talking about "cliched picture making", huh?

Hopefully, this is all tongue - in - cheek. Otherwise, I'll have to put you up on the wall next to pictures of Gingrich, Bachmann, Cain, and Palin, all of whom also indulge in magnificent episodes of "imagination".

November 20, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterPaul Maxim

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>