counter customizable free hit
About This Website

This blog is intended to showcase my pictures or those of other photographers who have moved beyond the pretty picture and for whom photography is more than entertainment - photography that aims at being true, not at being beautiful because what is true is most often beautiful..

>>>> Comments, commentary and lively discussions, re: my writings or any topic germane to the medium and its apparatus, are vigorously encouraged.

Search this site
Recent Topics
Journal Categories
Archives by Month
Subscribe
listed

Photography Directory by PhotoLinks

Powered by Squarespace
Login
« civilized ku # 228 ~ King Kong's perch | Main | civilized ku # 224-26 ~ the Empire Diner »
Thursday
Oct222009

civilized ku # 227 ~ awash in blood

1044757-4522866-thumbnail.jpg
Bruce Silverstein Gallery ~ Chelsea, NYCclick to embiggen
Knowing that there was little change of seeing anything, photography-wise, I went down to the Chelsea art district on Monday afternoon. Monday is the day that most galleries are closed.

My low expectations were met and, in fact, vastly exceeded. Not a gallery was open. But the other reason I went to Chelsea was to get a feel for the ongoing devastation in the gallery scene. My high expectations were met and, in fact, vastly exceeded.

Without even venturing into any of the gallery buildings, it was apparent just at street level that the so-called recession is taking a devastating toll - if one ever wanted to open a gallery in Chelsea, now's the time, at least from an available space POV. There are empty street-level galleries spaces all over the place. I would also bet that the rents have dropped like a stone as well.

However, one had better include no sales as an integral part of your business plan. It's a fact that galleries, large and small all across NYC, are selling nothing. Nada, Zip. If they don't have any working capital, they're gone in a NYC minute.

So, if you go to NYC for a gallery crawl, Monday is the day to make pictures, not see them. And, with all of the picturing possibilities, like ...

Reader Comments (2)

Perhaps if those galleries catered to the common man, instead of just the super-rich collectors, and offered art at a more affordable price, they wouldn't have to close their doors. I may be in the minority here, but I just can't feel bad for an establishment that goes out of business because no one is buying their $1000+ photographic prints.

October 23, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterAnil Rao

Right! I can see the photog's temptation - 1000s of bucks for a print, but can't justify paying same myself - as much as I might like the image. There's no way I'm gonna put down my hard earned (not really - I don't dig ditches and I'm not a garbage/fire man) on a piece of paper - I'd always be willing to pay materials plus 10% and shipping. For me stuff I hang on my walls is decoration. Sometimes a little more, but primarily deco. I'm willing to swap, tho.

October 23, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterMike O'Donoghue

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>