counter customizable free hit
About This Website

This blog is intended to showcase my pictures or those of other photographers who have moved beyond the pretty picture and for whom photography is more than entertainment - photography that aims at being true, not at being beautiful because what is true is most often beautiful..

>>>> Comments, commentary and lively discussions, re: my writings or any topic germane to the medium and its apparatus, are vigorously encouraged.

Search this site
Recent Topics
Journal Categories
Archives by Month
Subscribe
listed

Photography Directory by PhotoLinks

Powered by Squarespace
Login
« nfscd # 3 | Main | now for something completely different »
Monday
Mar032008

nfscd # 2

pghcvbsm.jpg1044757-1384713-thumbnail.jpg
Dancing and leapingclick to embiggen
Back in the days before Photoshop, creating pictures like 'dancing and leaping' was a long and demanding process. In this case, our intrepid subjects, Rod Woodson of the Pittsburgh Steelers and a dancer from the Pittsburgh Ballet, were required to leap, jump, twist, turn and generally contort their bodies every which way over and over and over again.

In today's PS universe, a photographer can work with each subject individually in order to capture the 'perfect' body language and then paste the 2 separate images together in PS. Back in the stone ages of the analog photography world, it was necessary to keep shooting and shooting until the photographer felt he 'had it' in the can. Notice, I said "felt he had it", because there was no way of knowing for certain that you 'had it' until the film came out of the soup.

The difficulty / challenge of getting 2 subjects to get the right body language at the same instant is, well, difficult and a challenge. In this case, a series of pictures for a Pittsburgh tourism campaign, the degree of difficulty was mitigated by the fact that I was able to photograph a professional athlete and a professional dancer who were, in a sense, just 'doing their thing(s)'. I can't even imagine what it would have been like if I had to use models who would have had to fake it.

Just thought you might like a glimpse at life before faking it has become the way to go.

Reader Comments (1)

So...you don't think a professional studio photographer with a $30,000 digital hasselblad and $100,000 in lighting and studio equipment wouldn't do it this way today?

I mean I'm sure the production department would "touchup" skin blemishes and wrinkles in the clothing, but why wouldn't it be done the same way with all of today's hi-tech camera and lighting advancements?

March 4, 2008 | Unregistered Commenteraaron

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>