counter customizable free hit
About This Website

This blog is intended to showcase my pictures or those of other photographers who have moved beyond the pretty picture and for whom photography is more than entertainment - photography that aims at being true, not at being beautiful because what is true is most often beautiful..

>>>> Comments, commentary and lively discussions, re: my writings or any topic germane to the medium and its apparatus, are vigorously encouraged.

Search this site
Recent Topics
Journal Categories
Archives by Month
Subscribe
listed

Photography Directory by PhotoLinks

Powered by Squarespace
Login
« CN Tower ~ Toronto, Canada | Main | FYI ~ Wildness Close to Home Gallery is open »
Wednesday
Nov072007

fun on the beach

beachstuffsm.jpg1044757-1138567-thumbnail.jpg
Screwing around on the beachclick to embiggen
One of the 'things' inherent in the Polaroid medium is the propensity to just have fun. The instant feedback one gets from viewing a print, as opposed to chimping, is very intoxicating, addictive and, if you give in to the urge, expensive.

I can state, without reservation, that Polaroiding is by far the most fun I've ever had with a camera. The Polaroid experience really promotes spontaneity and, at times, rather frivolous behavior, photography-wise. For me, it is also the one photo format that I use more than any other to photograph people.

I don't know exactly why this is, but I do know that people tend to relate to a Polaroid camera in way that is different than the way they react when you point a slr-type camera at them and I tend to act and think in a different manner as well.

Photographers talk about how their picture taking MO is different when they use a view camera as opposed to a small format camera. That's never been the case for me. I switch between those formats and my vision and style come through unchanged. It's only with the Polaroid(s) that I become a changed man.

Anyone else out there with a similar experience?

Reader Comments (7)

Years ago, I bought a Polaroid "Reporter". It took (for that matter still takes) Polaroid pack film. The only thing that saved me from financial disaster was the fact that the thing didn't have a motor drive. I love the colours that 108 film gives, and the tones in the 667.

Oh, gees - I'm beginning to feel an itch....

November 7, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterstephen connor

I love Polaroids. Now I'm thinking it's time to dig out the camera again. Oy.

The other camera that really changes me as a photographer is my Zero Image 6x9 pinhole camera. I just LOVE using it.

November 7, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterSean McCormick

That new pack of Time Zero film was like a box of dark chocolat truffles - damn hard to stop before it was done.

November 8, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterJeri Eisenberg

If there's a run on Polaroid film throughout the photography community, I guess we can blame it on the "Hobson Effect."

November 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterKent Wiley

That works for me Kent. I was out photographing in the pasture this afternoon and wasn't as attentive to my surroundings as I should have been. I stepped in a rather fresh cow pie. I'm blaming that on the "Hobson Effect" as well.

November 10, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterSean McCormick

Check out www.polanoid.net for a real treat.

November 20, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterMike

Bad thread! Bad thread! I bought a Pronto! when the first came out in 1976. I couldn't afford an SX-70 then. It was fun. I need to look for some of those prints for scanning. But Mark, since SX-70 film is no longer available, what do you use for film? Blended? 600? I assume you are using an SX-70. Enlighten us so that we may go forth instantly.

November 24, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterGordon Coale

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>