ku # 1172 ~ what the frick??
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af5d0/af5d02e165c3ab18fee122daef291f9637f2f33a" alt="Date Date"
Sunrise ~ Blue Mountain Lake, NY - in the Adirondack Park • click to embiggenOn the entry ku # 1168-71, Paul Maxim asked:
"Chasing the light" or "taking advantage of the light": What the frick is the difference??
IMO, the frickin' difference is: reflexively responding to a serendipitous encounter with the natural world vs. a fetishistic and obsessive-compulsive preoccupation, picture making wise, with picturing only the "right" landscape in the "right" light.
And, BTW, I didn't coin the phrase "chasing the light". It was coined, as an honorific self-aggrandizing title, by those who do, in fact, chase the light. I suspect they coined the phrase because they are very proud of the effort and work it takes to get it all so "right".
Whether one considers the nomenclature to be praise or demeaning, I am in basic agreement with the art critic, Sally Eauclaire, who so eloquently wrote:
... such photographers often choose such picturesque subject matter as prodigious crags, rippling sands, or flaming sunsets. Drawing upon the Hudson River School's legacy in painting, they burden it with ever coarser effects. Rather than humbly seek out the "spirit of fact", they assume the role of God's art director making His imminence unequivocal and protrusive.
To be certain, if "prodigious crags, rippling sands, or flaming sunsets" (et al) and "assuming the role of God's art director" float's one's picture making boat, then, by all means, have at it. It's big broad picture making world out there and somebody's got to do it.
For me, I'll just take it and make it as it comes.