civilized ku # 100 ~ small town values
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af5d0/af5d02e165c3ab18fee122daef291f9637f2f33a" alt="Date Date"
Electric "car" • click to embiggenOne of the advantages of living in a small village and/or an area dominated by small villages is that transportation vehicles like this one are a real viable option. There are no expressways and no congestion that are part of daily life or the driving experience. But, of course, since vehicles like this are not Big Oil friendly, our friends for change on the Right don't really talk about this as a "small town value".
My thanks to Paul Maxim, Clarence ... er, I mean Jimmi Nuffin, and the wife for speaking up on behalf of people, not statics and figures - those things that free-market absolutists like to hide behind because ... well ... figures and statistics don't go to bed hungry at night or live in substandard housing in neighborhoods that have been abandoned by the business class.
Despite what some might think, I am not an anti free-market zealot. The free market has been berry berry good to me and mine. BUT, while that system of economics can and does create prosperity and wealth for some, the manner in which that system is employed by many in this country causes it to create a lot of "losers" as opposed to "winners". What bothers me the most about this situation is that the free-market zealots adamantly refuse to deal with and/or recognize that fact as it applies to real people as opposed to economic "theory".
Instead, as was put forth by Reagan and his tinkle-down economics pals and adopted as a natural law of economics ever since - if you're a loser, it's your own damn fault. You deserve what you get (or don't get) because you obviously simply have not availed yourself of your opportunity to ... well ... become president or a high-roller CEO or a rock star, or even a hardworking well paid worker - oh wait, those jobs are all disappearing or being shipped overseas so that the American business class can remain "competitive" and "profitable".
So, Trevor, give us all a break from your insipid and pointless notions about how well the poor have it in the US of A as opposed to some third world country. The facts of real life, not statics or figures, in these here United States - the richest nation in the world - is that it is a national shame and disgrace that so many of us deal with so many forms of deprivation - food, healthcare, education, safety, and opportunity - on a daily basis.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af5d0/af5d02e165c3ab18fee122daef291f9637f2f33a" alt="Registered Commenter Registered Commenter"
Featured Comment: Mark M wrote: "...Clearly the choice is not between all government and no government that the polarizing pundits make it out to be."
My response: exactly right. Any moron who thinks that "our free market system would work better if our government would get out of the way" obviously doesn't stay informed about what's really going on today much less have any sense whatsoever of the early history of the unregulated free market system in this country.