man & nature # 124 ~ human "beavers" (Spring has sprung # 8)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af5d0/af5d02e165c3ab18fee122daef291f9637f2f33a" alt="Date Date"
This blog is intended to showcase my pictures or those of other photographers who have moved beyond the pretty picture and for whom photography is more than entertainment - photography that aims at being true, not at being beautiful because what is true is most often beautiful..
>>>> Comments, commentary and lively discussions, re: my writings or any topic germane to the medium and its apparatus, are vigorously encouraged.
BODIES OF WORK ~ PICTURE GALLERIES
BODIES OF WORK ~ BOOK LINKS
In Situ ~ la, la, how the life goes on • Life without the APA • Doors • Kitchen Sink • Rain • 2014 • Year in Review • Place To Sit • ART ~ conveys / transports / reflects • Decay & Disgust • Single Women • Picture Windows • Tangles ~ fields of visual energy (10 picture preview) • The Light + BW mini-gallery • Kitchen Life (gallery) • The Forks ~ there's no place like home (gallery)
A Spring thicket • click to embiggenThe Frame - one of the characteristics and problems inherent in the medium of photography.
The photographer's picture was not conceived but selected, his subjects were never truly discrete, never wholly self-contained. The edges of his film demarcated what he thought most important, but the subject he had shot was something else; it extended in four directions ... The central act of photography, the act of choosing and eliminating, forces a concentration on the picture edge - the line that separates in from out - and on the shapes that are created by it. ~ John Szarkowski - from The Photographer's Eye
In case anyone was wondering, the black frame common to all of my pictures - a nod to the wet-darkroom tradition of printing the film's clear borders - is the most obvious of my techniques that "forces a concentration on the picture edge - the line that separates in from out - and on the shapes that are created by it".
Featured Comment: Bill Gotz asked a very good question: "Do you find any irony in the fact that the black edge was usually included to prove that the picture was reproduced full frame, as the photographer originally took it, but that your photographs are created by cropping?"
my response: While I might vigorously protest that my pictures are NOT cropped - I see square, even if my sensor does not - the fact is that my square pictures are cropped from a rectangular image file. Since, up 'til now there were no dslrs that offered native in-camera square image files, I have been forced into using what the US military calls a field-expediency methodology to get squared away.
But, to answer your question - "Yes. Absolutely." My entire visual presentation is intended to be somewhat ironic or, at the very least, a bit of trompe l'oeil - very much intended to be a sort of backhanded slap across the face of the digital perfectionists in the photography crowd who are in hot pursuit of technically perfect but insipidly dull (content-wise) pictures.
Bare tree at marsh edge • click to embiggenThe other evening I caught one of the BBC's episodes of their Genius of Photography (broadcast on the OVATION TV here in the US of A). The title of that episode is, Document for Artists.
The basic premise of the program is that the medium of photography, which was at first thought to be little more than the making of documents, albeit visual documents, eventually became to be viewed as more than mere documentation. That pictures could contain meaning(s) - whether intended by the picture maker or not - that transcended their nominal visual information.
The pictures of Eugene Atget, which were intended to be a "mere" record of things there were about to disappear - a way of life as represented by the monuments, houses, sites, streets, stores, cafes, of his beloved Paris, were used as an example of "pure" picture documents created without artistic intent that came to be considered as high Art. Interestingly enough, it was the avant-garde photographer/artist Man Ray who brought Atget's pictures to the attention of the Art World - an endeavor carried on by his then assistant, the photographer Berenice Abbott. It was through her life-long efforts that Atget and his pictures gained international recognition.
While I toil, picture-making wise, on the influential shoulders of many of the medium's past and present giants - Evans, Callahan, Porter, Shore, Meyerowitz, to name but a few - it is the totality of the voluminous body of work that Atget created that most influences my own picturing activities.
It seems rather obvious to me that the man was just flat-out obsessed with picturing his beloved Paris if for no other reason than his desire to record what would soon be lost - a drive that most accurately reflects my own predilection for picturing my beloved Adirondacks. Heaven knows that there is much that will soon be lost here in the Adirondacks - natural-world changes that are a consequence of global warming / climate change as well as social / cultural changes, aka - the destructive forces of the second/vacation home scourge/plague on local communities and institutions.
Unlike the document-making activities of Atget (but, on a somewhat ironic note, influenced by the eventual recognition of the Art inherent in his documents), my picture making activities are also informed and influenced by a conscious awareness of their artful instrumentality - aka, my oft-stated intent to illustrate and illuminate.
All of that said, there was a line regarding the medium of photography in the aforementioned tv program that I liked very much. To the best of my recollection, it went something like this:
Document influenced by Art. Art influenced by document.
That's a good one that says much about the medium's inherent characteristics and its potential to transcend the notion that a picture is just a picture.
Another stump in a marsh • click to embiggenJohn Szarkowski, in his book, The Photographer's Eye, lists the detail as one of the medium's inherent characteristics about which he stated:
.... The photographer was tied to the fact of things ... he could only record it as he found it ... he could only isolated the fragment, document it, and by doing so claim for it some special significance, a meaning which went beyond simple description ... [T]he compelling clarity with which a photograph recorded the trivial suggested that the subject had never before been properly seen, that it was in fact perhaps not trivial, but filled with undiscovered meaning. - italic emphasis by me
The more I understand my attraction to picturing - both the making and viewing thereof, the more I realize that I am immensely attracted to the detail and, without a doubt, the medium of photography excels at recording with compelling clarity those details which at first glance appear to be quite trivial. As far as I am concerned, the more packed with compelling-clarity detail a picture is, the more I am attracted to it - I get no kick from visual simplicity (or very little).
But here's the thing about the detail in my pictures - at best, I pay little attention to the detail found in my pictures at the point-in-time of picturing them. My only awareness of them is as clumps / fields of details as opposed to specific / discrete / individual elements. At the point-in-time of picturing it is those clumps / fields, viewed as a whole, that I attempt to organize across the 2-dimensional surface (and within the frame) of the yet-to-be print in a pleasing manner.
This approach to picturing, that is to essentially ignore the detail specifics when picturing, is the reason why my eye, my mind, and oft times my soul are endlessly fascinated by my own pictures - even though I made them, they are filled with compelling-clarity details that I did not see at the point-in-time of picturing them but that I can discover and explore after the fact of picturing.
I find it quite amazing that I can so regularly amaze myself.
FYI, this entry is the fulfillment, at least in part, of my stated intent to discuss the following from Minor White:
When I look at pictures I have made, I have forgotten what I saw in front of the camera and respond only to what I am seeing in the photographs. ~ Minor White
Stump in a marsh • click to embiggenAs most Landscapist regulars know, I am not a light-stalker but, every once in a while, the light puts on quite a show. Today was one of those times.
Admittedly, the light was not the light that most, who are in it for the entertainment buzz, spend their time stalking. It was a little after high noon which, in these here parts at this time of year, still puts the sun in the southern sky. The net effect is a bit of backlight and, at certain angles to your referent, a strong, hard, and high directional light.
In order to soften things a bit, I used a 400mm (35mm equivalent) lens together with an f/4 aperture.
Moss and lichen covered rock face above the Au Sable • click to embiggen
Be certain to check out the ALERTS on Saturday's entry below
And, please continue to send in "entries" for the FREE print offer.
I am awash in new Spring pictures so this week I will be concentrating on posting pictures and not so much on words (at least that's the plan). Please feel free to comment on my pictures, in fact, I encourage it.
Spring vines • click to embiggenA few weeks ago I mentioned that Ritz Camera Stores had filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization. I also mentioned that their wide format Epson printer was the only one left standing in our neck of the woods and if they closed I'd have to consider getting one. Well, as part of their reorganization, Ritz Camera is closing 400 of their stores and, you guessed it, our local-ish store is one of them.
Long story short, I went to the store yesterday to have a few more prints made and ending up leaving the store as the proud owner of their just-like-new Epson 7800 printer. I purchased it for the princely sum of $500. I kid you not - $500. Mint condition, all documentation, disks, and a network card installed.
That said, here's the ALERT - All 400 Ritz Camera stores that are closing have an Epson 7800 for sale for $500. It's first come, first serve but if they have already sold theirs, they will get one for you from another store that has one available. Just remember, he/she who hesitates ...
That said, here's the second ALERT - I take delivery of my printer on or about May 11th after which I will be setting it up and calibrating it in preparation for offering custom printing services to just 20 customers.
I already have an ftp site online for customers - from anywhere on the planet - to upload their files for printing. Unlike other online printers, I will work with each customer individually to create a personal printing profile for their files. Proof prints (downsized) will be sent for approval prior to final print making. Arrangements can be made for printing on virtually any paper the customer might want to use.
That said, in order to help in calibrating the printer, I would like to work with files other than just my own, so, here's my offer (think of it as a "contest" of sorts):
I need 5 volunteers who would like to have a FREE 24 x standard-format-of-your-camera inch print of one of your pictures. No purchase necessary. No obligations. Just be willing to work with me to, dare I say, "get it right".
Don't be intimidated by the print size relative to your native image file size. Assuming that you can send me a good quality file - 8mp minimum, although that's open to question (bigger is fine, smaller maybe) - with good sharpness /resolution, I will handle any up-res needed to print at the large size. Unless, of course, you choose to do it yourself.
If you are interested in this offer, please email me (link on the right) ASAP with a lores sample of the image you would like to print. I will select 5 "winners" for printing from the submissions.
Once again, remember, he/she who hesitates ...
FYI - submissions are rolling in. Thanks very much. Please keep them coming - I'll keep accepting them for next 3 weeks or so.
Also, I would really like to know what you would like from a custom print service. I am totally open to suggestions. FYI, custom print service = Me, a real, live person with whom you can communicate (email, phone, whatever) regarding your printing needs.
Mark Hobson - Physically, Emotionally and Intellectually Engaged Since 1947