counter customizable free hit
About This Website

This blog is intended to showcase my pictures or those of other photographers who have moved beyond the pretty picture and for whom photography is more than entertainment - photography that aims at being true, not at being beautiful because what is true is most often beautiful..

>>>> Comments, commentary and lively discussions, re: my writings or any topic germane to the medium and its apparatus, are vigorously encouraged.

Search this site
Recent Topics
Journal Categories
Archives by Month
Subscribe
listed

Photography Directory by PhotoLinks

Powered by Squarespace
Login

BODIES OF WORK ~ PICTURE GALLERIES

  • my new GALLERIES WEBSITE
    ADK PLACES TO SIT / LIFE WITHOUT THE APA / RAIN / THE FORKS / EARLY WORK / TANGLES

BODIES OF WORK ~ BOOK LINKS

In Situ ~ la, la, how the life goes onLife without the APADoorsKitchen SinkRain2014 • Year in ReviewPlace To SitART ~ conveys / transports / reflectsDecay & DisgustSingle WomenPicture WindowsTangles ~ fields of visual energy (10 picture preview) • The Light + BW mini-galleryKitchen Life (gallery) • The Forks ~ there's no place like home (gallery)


Entries in polaroids (26)

Monday
Feb252008

it's all over now, Baby Blue

1044757-1367532-thumbnail.jpg
Old electric fanclick to embiggen
1044757-1367537-thumbnail.jpg
Pittsburgh's strip districtclick to embiggen
1044757-1367544-thumbnail.jpg
Flowers at Woods Holeclick to embiggen
As has been reported elsewhere, Polaroid has given up the ghost, film-wise. I had previously mentioned the end of the line for SX-70 (Time Zero) film, but this is the end of the line for all film-related photography products - including all of their professional sheet films. What a pity.

In my commercial studio heyday, I used Polaroid professional sheet films like it was going out of style. Dollar-wise, I spent way more on Polaroid film than I did on Kodak film. Polaroid was the only testing / pre-shoot proofing method around. I was fully invested in Polaroid holders and backs for every format I had - 35mm, 120, 4×5, and 8×10. I'll wager that you never knew there was a Polaroid back for Nikon 35mm slrs.

While I was never a hardcore BW guy, one of the best 4×5 bw sheet films on the planet was Polaroid Type 55. Not only did you get the instant print, but you also got an instant negative as well. Sure, the negative needed be treated in a clearing agent and washed, but the advantages of dust-free film packets was wonderful. If you worked in the field, you just shot as much as you wanted and saved the instant processing for later.

And the negative? Polaroid Type 55 negatives are the most buttery smooth (tone-wise), sharp and grain-less, extended dynamic range bw film that I ever used. The resultant prints were simply gorgeous. It's really a shame that the experience of using this film is about to disappear, most likely forever (unless someone buys the manufacturing rights).

Me, I'm grateful as hell that another firm is continuing the manufacture of Polaroid film for the SX-70 and Spectra class cameras, even though the film for the SX-70 is not Time Zero film - the only Polaroid film that let you really play around with the emulsion - it stayed squishy malleable for hours.

I wonder how soon the day will come for the end of the line of all photographic film?

Tuesday
Jan292008

FYI ~ A career in photography

photowparrot.jpgFor those of you out there who are contemplating leaving their day job for a full time career in photography, might I suggest the rather eclectic and little practiced speciality field of Photo with the Parrot.

Here's what i know about it - one day in the early 80s, the X, the kids, and I were in NYC visiting a friend. We all went to Little Italy during the St. Anthony (of Giovinazzo) festival. The place was mobbed but we were able to get into the restaurant our friend wanted us to experience. It was a decidedly relaxed establishment replete with a rather large all-black clad mama mia who roamed the premise singing (accompanied by a very handsome and swarthy young guitarist).

The crowd were well into their cups and much revelry was in evidence. In short, a good time was being had by all when, in the front door, came the gentleman, his parrot, and his Polaroid cameras. Even with all the din, it only took one pronouncement of "Get yer photo with the parrot." to set off a near frenzy of eager patrons.

At $3.00 a pop, he was raking it in as fast as his SX-70s could spit 'em out. He seemed to have an endless supply of Time-Zero film and, more importantly, the parrot seemed to be on some kind of parrot-downers. It was remarkably calm in the clamor and high-jinks that surrounded it. I kept waiting for it to rip off some inebriated patron's ear, but it just went calmly about its business with a remarkable amount of patience and aplomb.

While everyone else was having their picture taken with the parrot, I offered the photographer double his regular fee if I could take his picture with the parrot (and my kids). He, of course, obliged.

After his stint in the restaurant, he went out into the street where he was again mobbed by eager patrons. As best as I could tell, this guy was raking in at least $100 an hour. Not bad at all in 1980 dollars.

Also, as best as I can tell, here's the formula for success - several Polaroid cameras, lots of Polaroid film, locations with large gatherings preferably with readily available liquor and beer, a well-adjusted parrot (or maybe 2 - keep one in relief), and lots of patience with intoxicated patrons.

Oh yeah, and don't forget the hat and sweatshirt.

Wednesday
Nov072007

CN Tower ~ Toronto, Canada

cntower.jpg
Looking down from near the top of the CN Tower, Toronto CA

Hey all, I'm off to Pittsburgh, PA for a press check. I'll be checking in and maybe posting. In any event, the Wildness Close to Home Gallery is off to fine start. Keep it up.

Wednesday
Nov072007

fun on the beach

beachstuffsm.jpg1044757-1138567-thumbnail.jpg
Screwing around on the beachclick to embiggen
One of the 'things' inherent in the Polaroid medium is the propensity to just have fun. The instant feedback one gets from viewing a print, as opposed to chimping, is very intoxicating, addictive and, if you give in to the urge, expensive.

I can state, without reservation, that Polaroiding is by far the most fun I've ever had with a camera. The Polaroid experience really promotes spontaneity and, at times, rather frivolous behavior, photography-wise. For me, it is also the one photo format that I use more than any other to photograph people.

I don't know exactly why this is, but I do know that people tend to relate to a Polaroid camera in way that is different than the way they react when you point a slr-type camera at them and I tend to act and think in a different manner as well.

Photographers talk about how their picture taking MO is different when they use a view camera as opposed to a small format camera. That's never been the case for me. I switch between those formats and my vision and style come through unchanged. It's only with the Polaroid(s) that I become a changed man.

Anyone else out there with a similar experience?

Tuesday
Nov062007

Boxing gloves ~ 2 views

boxingglovessm.jpg1044757-1137385-thumbnail.jpg
Boxing glovesclick to embiggen
2 variations for an assignment to create an illustration for a magazine article titled Vanishing Gyms. The assignment was for one picture but they ended up using both. The manipulated Polaroid was used as the feature picture and the 'straight' Polaroid was used on a sidebar.

I literally have 100s of Polaroids in a couple boxes that I must do something about. Fortunately, they are virtually indestructible.

Tuesday
Nov062007

big things in small packages

beachstump.jpgThe boy when he was a boy

In addition to the boy's show, I visited a number of other shows - Ed Burtynsky's Quarries, Prabuddha Dasgupta's Longing, Alison Carey's Organic Remains of Former World, and few others. I'll be writing about all them shortly.

I felt privileged to see all of them - in each case, I felt as though the artist had invited me into their private world to share a few secrets. This was especially true of Longing. My other son, Jason, and I were alone in the gallery and I had sought out the owner/gallery director to ask a few questions. After just one question, she asked me, "Why not ask the photographer? I'll go get him." We had a delightful conversation about which I will write later on.

The biggest and best 'priviledge' of the day was none of the above. It came when I stumbled upon the exhibit The Polaroids by Andre Kertesz. It's no secret that I really love the Polaroid medium, so to wander through an exhibit of Polaroids made by one of the seminal figures in the history of photography was a pure delight.

As is my wont, I browsed the exhibit before seeking out the exhibition intro. This is my standard MO - look at the images first to get a first impression and then learn more about the artist's intent and read what others might have to say about it. Again, it's no secret that I think pictures without words - not captions, but artist statements, etc. - are only part of the game and The Polaroids exhibit is a case in point.

The pictures, in and of themselves, were visually interesting and intriguing - especially so because of recurring pieces of glass forms including one in particular. The pictures were very warm, intimate and primarily on a smallish scale. All of this created a feeling of a glimpse into a private/personal 'intimacy'. Very, very nice.

What I didn't know, and could not know, from just viewing the pictures was that 'following the loss of his wife Elizabeth to lung cancer in 1977, and nearing the end of his own life, Kertész was admittedly a broken man.

Alone and in New York, a city in which he never felt fully embraced, Kertész would once again retreat into the safe confines of his Fifth Avenue apartment overlooking Washington Square Park. Fortunately, it was the inspiration found in a small glass bust, discovered in the window of a local bookshop, whose figure reminded him of his late wife, which would trigger the artist’s remarkable recovery process. The resultant body of work is now the focus of this unique exhibition.

Turning to a relatively new technology, the Polaroid SX-70, Kertész worked through his overwhelming grief, obsessively shooting the bust alone and placing it among other artifacts he and Elizabeth had collected together over the years. Taken from within his apartment, he photographed many of these still-lifes by placing personal objects against cityscape backgrounds, which were often reflected and modulated by glass surfaces ... ' - from the exhibit press release

It should go without saying that, after reading the press release, the pictures took on a whole expanded meaning. They were no longer 'just' visually interesting and intriguing pictures. For me, knowing what I now knew, the pictures became (as the press release also stated) '... powerful metaphorical and literal symbols of life, love, loss, death and mortality.'

IMO, pictures without words are 'just' pictures. They may be visually pleasing and a delight to the eye and even, to certain extent, the mind and the soul but knowing, at the very least, intent of the maker can enrich the pictures to an incredible degree.

FYI - a couple points of interest. The SX 70 camera was a gift to Kertesz from Graham Nash of the famed Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young and who, in addition to being a musician, is also a photographer and collector.

The Polaroids themselves were for sale. They were from the estate of Kertesz. What I found interesting about this is that, of course, the Polaroids were truly limited editions of 1. No negatives. No reprints. Nada. 1 and only 1. When they're gone (sold), they're gone. That's why I purchased the book. You should too. PS The book costs under $30. 1 original Polaroid costs $9,000. Take your pick.

I was also immediately struck by the coincidence that another seminal figure in the history of photography, Walker Evans, also received as a gift (from a dentist who was doing dental work for Evans in exchange for prints), a Polaroid SX 70 - a camera which he also used for a few years at the end of his life to create a significant body of work which, like Kertesz, was also his last.

Thursday
Oct182007

mea culpa, mea culpa, ~ the things we do for money

frontporch.jpgPumpkin and leaves on the front step

mea maxima culpa - Oh, the ignominious irony of it all. Perhaps, in some form of karma, it's all coming back to haunt me -

As I was reading from The Art of the American Snapshot, I came across this; "In addition to camera manuals, Kodak published guides such as Picture Making and Picture Taking (c.1900), The Modern Way to Picture Making (c. 1905), How to Make Good Pictures (from 1912), and Kodakery: A Journal for Amateur photographers (from 1913). Each of these publications provided examples of 'good' photographs, which emphasized images of innocent, carefree, and pretty children as well as leisure pursuits, attractive landscapes, and portraits ... Kodakery included two-page spreads in each issue that showed photographs of these preferred subjects ..."

The well-meaning intent of all of this 'advice' was to "aid the ambitious beginner, and enable him to avoid the most common mistakes incident to the first stages of this interesting study". The actual unintended result of all these rote prescriptions was "'good' photographs [which] are, not surprisingly, stiff, bland, and boring. Not only do they possess none of the humor of the 'bad' photographs, but they have none of their immediacy or authenticity."

So, it appears that right from the very beginning of photography by the masses - and continuing right to this day, photographers were advised to stick to the 'rules' in order to make 'good' photographs.

Most here know what I think about the 'rules' - one-size fits all, cookie-cutter patterns for those who can't think on their own, but, I have a confession to make - for quite a number of years, I thought nothing of accepting assignments from Kodak to make conforming-to-the-rules pictures for their various How to Make Good Pictures guides.

To repeat, Oh, the ignominious irony of it all. To all of those who have been ensnared in the rules of photography and are having a tough time escaping, I'm very sorry. You have my sincere regrets and apology. I was young(er) then and didn't know what I was doing. Maybe my efforts here on The Landscapist will make up in some small way all the damage I may have inflicted.

Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa.

Monday
Apr302007

Fishkill, NY

fishkill.jpgGarden of earthy delightsno embiggen - it's a Polaroid

Spring 'blossoms' in Fishkill, NY - along the lower Hudson River Valley.

It was Worldwide Pinhole Photography Day, I was on the road again and I had run out of film so I took a Polaroid picture as a nod towards alternative process photography.

There is nothing as mysterious as a fact clearly described. ~ Garry Winogrand