counter customizable free hit
About This Website

This blog is intended to showcase my pictures or those of other photographers who have moved beyond the pretty picture and for whom photography is more than entertainment - photography that aims at being true, not at being beautiful because what is true is most often beautiful..

>>>> Comments, commentary and lively discussions, re: my writings or any topic germane to the medium and its apparatus, are vigorously encouraged.

Search this site
Recent Topics
Journal Categories
Archives by Month
Subscribe
listed

Photography Directory by PhotoLinks

Powered by Squarespace
Login

BODIES OF WORK ~ PICTURE GALLERIES

  • my new GALLERIES WEBSITE
    ADK PLACES TO SIT / LIFE WITHOUT THE APA / RAIN / THE FORKS / EARLY WORK / TANGLES

BODIES OF WORK ~ BOOK LINKS

In Situ ~ la, la, how the life goes onLife without the APADoorsKitchen SinkRain2014 • Year in ReviewPlace To SitART ~ conveys / transports / reflectsDecay & DisgustSingle WomenPicture WindowsTangles ~ fields of visual energy (10 picture preview) • The Light + BW mini-galleryKitchen Life (gallery) • The Forks ~ there's no place like home (gallery)


Entries in picture windows (60)

Tuesday
Dec232008

picture window # 18 ~ it's cold outside

1044757-2289870-thumbnail.jpg
Fresh snow and bone-chilling coldclick to embiggen
Some say that the act of making a picture removes one from the experience of the moment. Those who think so are heard to proclaim that, on occasion, they put aside the camera in order to more fully experience whatever moment it is with which they are engaged.

This notion has always left me a bit puzzled because I have never really felt that particular conflict of interest. I suppose that is because I don't make a big deal out of the simple act of making a picture - bring camera to eye, adjust exposure if needed, look, and press the shutter release, return to "reality". How hard is that?

And, if your looking comes in the form of being really attentive to your surroundings, how the hell can a heightened state of awareness detract from a given moment?

Although, it does seems to me that most who are picturing / experiencing conflicted are those whose looking is bloated with thinking. That is, thinking about things photographic - looking for leading-lines, thinking about composition, et al (aka, the rules) - in short thinking about what kind of picture you are trying to make.

For me, thinking instead of looking ruins everything - it ruins both the moment and the chances of making a good picture. Ansel-the-Magnificent said it best:

There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs

It has been opined by some that the "rules for making good photographs" are, in fact, little more than after-the-fact extrapolations made from good pictures. To be totally cynical about it, that could mean that those who are the keepers of the faith in the "rules" just make up rules after seeing a good picture in order to create a "good-picture" making coda for those without imagination who wish to repeat the already observed fact.

IMO, the single most destructive notion to the act of making good pictures is to fall victim to the idea that "you need to learn the rules before you can break the rules", which, IMO, is akin to the need to spend a year in a Nike sweatshop making sneakers before you start working on your jump shot. And, just to make matters worse, keep thinking about that year making sneakers every time you attempt a jump shot.

Wednesday
Nov262008

civilized ku # 133 ~ selling cat shit to dogs

1044757-2189224-thumbnail.jpg
East Village restaurant ~ NYCclick to embiggen
Today I was going to write about a great way to find/develop a unique / personal vision, something that many find very difficult to do. Especially so if you want a vision that involves not just the Art of selection but also the Art of concept.

But, before I was able to create that entry, Bill Gotz left a comment on yesterday's entry about "the tingle":

Oh yes, the "tingle". That's what I love about great pictures, the internal itch that says there is something here. Those are the pictures I want to be with, that connect on a deep level, the ones I want to try to figure out. I usually can't fully figure them out but I know they connect to me somehow. That' what keeps me coming back to them, thinking about them when I'm not with them .... What is that, I don't know. Maybe its the beginning of an understanding of the allegory. Or maybe it's the connection to a more emotional metaphor. Or maybe its liking a pretty picture.

The reason that Bill's comment struck me with a "tingle" is the fact that last evening I spent a fair amount of time on Bill's site looking at his triptych / panoramic pictures, especially those in his Roads & Signs: Farmscapes and Roads & Signs: Yellowstone and Grand Tetons portfolios and what I ended up with was a massive case of the "tingles".

However, despite the tingle I was not immediately able to "dig deeper" into the metaphor / allegory / meaning thing in his pictures. In his comment, Bill also mentioned that "I think my pictures are more the record of exploration than an attempt at metaphor", which is something I can identify with relative to my picture making - I don't start out or even end up looking for referents that will/can act as metaphors - more on this later under the heading of "finding a unique vision".

Bill also stated that "I guess I connect to a picture on more of a gut level than on an intellectual level. The allegorical figurings aren't what what get me, it's something that's pre-verbal", which, once again, I can identify with regarding my picture viewing. I don't start out looking for the metaphor / allegory / meaning thing in pictures.

What I do when first viewing a picture is to, quite simply, just look. No preconceptions, expectations, or other "baggage - I just want to look and see what happens. Of course, what I delight in is when that "tingle" thing strikes - most often, it strikes in an immediate fashion but even if it doesn't I'll usually hang around for a bit to see if I can see something that is more than meets the eye.

In any event, here's my point in all of this - IMO, the medium of photography is, despite the fact that I really treasure pictures that offer more than just the obvious (and try my damnedest to make them), first and foremost a visual medium / language. I write this knowing full well that that idea flies in the face of much of the prevailing dogma from the academic lunatic fringe (and a big segment of the Art world, Photography Division) regarding the "standards" by which a picture /body of work gains admittance to the Art world.

I am much more in agreement with this notion:

On semiologists and post-modern photo-deconstructors: Academic imperialists are marginalizing the practice of making photographs instead of celebrating its power and magic. It appears to me, as an exhibiting photographer and as a teacher, that I am again in a world where the word is king with photographs as mere courtiers. I believe this trend to be regressive because it undermines photography and most of those who practice it. - Paul Hill

And, because I agree with the preceding statement, I am also of a mind - regarding my acceptance (or not) into that Art world - with this sentiment as well:

You see, I'm not interested in mediocrity in photography. I'm not interested in selling cat shit to dogs. I just want to do my own thing. If people like my work, all the better. If they don't, too bad. - Ralph Gibson

Tuesday
Nov252008

picture window # 17 ~ Brooklyn brownstone kitchen

1044757-2185737-thumbnail.jpg
Kitchen window ~ Brooklyn, NYclick to embiggen
I worry at times that bringing up subjects such as metaphors will result in a loss of audience. The response to yesterday's entry and questions does little to dispel that anxiety.

Nevertheless, I will continue along the same path with today's entry simply because as I was creating yesterday's entry I had thought of this picture as another fine example of something used, or regarded as being used, to represent something else. And, I also thought that I might inject a little bit of past personal history, re: metaphors.

My high school learning experience was a fairly demanding one - an all-male Jesuit institution. For those who don't know, the Jesuits are demanding taskmasters. Much is expected of students during their learning experience, especially regarding the development of one's ability to think. Not to memorize and regurgitate, but rather to figure things out.

One arena in which this was put to the test was that of literature. We had required reading lists galore - Summer reading lists, course reading lists, read it instead of having fun reading lists, sitting on the bus reading lists - you name, we had it. There was usually total freedom to choose the book you wished to read from the lists and you could put off the required reading for a while but eventually you had to pay the piper in the form of a book report.

Because everyone may have read a different book, there was no class discussion about the books so a book report had to be the product of your own making. What was expected in a book report was fairly detailed analysis of all of the usual suspects, literature-wise - plot line, character development, etc. - and the one device that always messed with me was identifying and describing, yep, you guessed it - metaphor, with allegory running a close second. BTW, with hindsight and a bit of rationalization, I chalk this up to the callowness of youth.

To this day, I read fiction on an almost purely literal level. To put it simply, I like good stories. The gooder, the better. My preference runs towards books in leftover / discount bins that have pictures of submarines, jet fighters, handguns (that a spy might carry), or splotches of blood (murder / mayhem mysteries). I read these things in bunches, just like eating a bowl of popcorn.

And, sure sure, their is a bit of metaphor / allegory to found. Usually a very little bit and that, most often, of the basic and cliched good vs. evil variety. But, for me, these things are very easy to digest. They are the equivalent of photographic eye candy, if you will.

3 or 4 times a year, there is such a pile of these books that we pack them up and take them over to the used bookstore here in town and just give them away. None of these books are "keepers". They are, in very real sense, disposable. But every once in a while, I buy a John Le Carré novel and that is something to savor and save - there are 5 or 6 of them on one of our many bookshelves. I know that I will return to these books to re-read, re-savor, and re-discover them.

Le Carré's novesl are rich and complex, full of details and character development and just like real life, his stories do not always have a "happy ending". The good guys are good but usually not all good. Good does not always defeat evil. Sometimes it struggles just to stay even. In short, his stories are great little vignettes of what it means to be human.

All of that said, here's the thing about metaphor and allegory - I still read Le Carré's novels literally. I do not sit around during or after reading them and pick them apart, literary devise wise. What I have discovered is that that the best literary devices get inside your head without you recognizing that they are literary devices or that they have pierced your mental defenses. They cause the reader to assimilate expanded messages and meaning almost without consciously being aware of it. In effect, the reader emerges from the reading experience as a more informed person without even knowing it.

IMO, I believe that the same is true of good pictures. At first glance, we may be attracted to such pictures purely on their ability to capture and hold the eye. But, I know, for me, that a really good picture also seems to trigger a little undefined twinge, a little tickle, somewhere in the back of my mind. A sensation that there is more to what I am seeing than meets the eye.

Given the chance and a willing ear, I will speculate and postulate to no small degree about what that little tingle might be about. And that exercise is always fun, especially more so if the willing ear also is associated with a flapping mouth that speculates and postulates in return. Invariably, all the windy flapping centers around something used, or regarded as being used, to represent something else. rarely, if ever, does the word "metaphor" surface, but, in fact .....

However, I don't find that that little bit of fun is always required in order to "enjoy" a picture. Sometimes what a picture has to say beyond the obvious just seems to settle in without a whole lot of thought required. In part because, with a really good still picture in hand (in a book, on a wall, where ever) you always have the option of returning to it and seeing it anew.

All of that said, my picture window series uses interior space and the view of what's outside that space as a metaphor for the space inside one's head and what's outside of that space - the other. We all build/make comfortable spaces, literally and figuratively, that we call "home". The place where you live, whether it's an actual home or the space inside our head.

You would be sorely lacking in a vital aspect of being human if you did not or could not do so. But, no matter where you go or what you "build", there is always the other. That which is outside of yourself, your comfort zones. That which does not conform to your will, your control, or your wishes. Consequently, there is always the matter of engaging and integrating the other.

IMO, to try and live a life without fully engaging and integrating the other is a recipe for human folly.

So, once again, I ask - are you aware of metaphor in the pictures of others? Do you ever experience the "tingle"? Does the use of metaphor have a place in your picturing?

Or, does a picture like today's picture window sink or swim entirely upon its visual interest or lack thereof? Or, can you get outside of yourself and get inside of it? Is it even worth the effort to try and get inside of it?

In closing, consider this (something that I have always felt was one of the driving forces in my picture making):

Photography is a tool for dealing with things everybody knows about but isn't attending to. My photographs are intended to represent something you don't see. - Emmet Gowin

Wednesday
Nov192008

picture window # 17 ~ Brooklyn brownstone picture window

1044757-2163033-thumbnail.jpg
Bedroom window ~ Brooklyn, NYclick to embiggen
In case anyone was wondering, I have not stopped making pictures for my Picture Windows or Decay series. For no particular reason, I just haven't been posting any pictures. That's about to change, especially now that cold weather is upon us, which for some reason is my prime "decay" picturing time.

Tuesday
Nov042008

civilized ku # 115 ~ sitting pretty

1044757-2100221-thumbnail.jpg
Sunday Brunch, Marché de la Villette ~ Montreal, CA.click to embiggen

Sunday
Jul202008

picture windows # 16 ~ KMA, SquareSpace

rain on window screenclick to embiggenSquareSpace has given me a very unpleasant surprise this AM. They have launched a new version - radically improved - that doesn't work at all with Firefox and only partially with Safari (both on a Mac).

So bear with me for a bit while I wait for an answer from their support. I can post using Safari but it won't let me create a thumbnail (amongst many other problems) with pop-up so there is no large image of this picture to view.

I can't believe how fucked up this is but then I have to say that I expect nothing more in the wonderful world of software. The world where software developers, large and small, have adopted the working premise of "don't worry, be crappy" - just foist whatever crap they have on the end-users and let them deal with the problems and an endless flow of "updates" and "patches" that attempt to make things "better".

In any event, I'll add a pop-up image as soon as I am able. In the meantime, here's a quote to accompany today's entry -

Life isn't perfect, but then photography isn't either. Indeed photography's imperfections are becoming all too familiar. Often now we hear that there are too many photographs, that we are buried in them. Growing accustomed to the burden of this accumulation has made it difficult to imagine what photographs we might still need. - Peter Galassi

I really like the notion of "what photographs we might still need". Do we really need an additional accumulation of pretty landscape pictures? Does that never-ending accumulation of pretty pictures desensitize us to the pictures that we really need - pictures that attempt to connect us to the real, not the fanciful? Pictures that require us to think rather than those that lull us to sleep (so that we can dream The Dream)?

Wednesday
Jul162008

picture window # 15 ~ the big grey dog is rolling ...

shangrilaviewsm.jpg1044757-1731822-thumbnail.jpg
2 fer 1click to embiggen
There seems to be a blog virus that's an intrinsic (and some might say, inevitable) component of blogging - the need to stuff it all after a protracted period of involvement. A number of blog notables - Alec Soth being the most obvious example, Tim Atherton being a lesser one - just decide, seemingly all of a sudden, to just quit. Soth with notice, Atherton without. Even Mike J. over on T.O.P. recently posted a "Gone Fishin'" entry and announced he was depending on guest contributers (for a while) for content.

Without a doubt, there is a kind of blogging "fatigue" that can set in. I know the feeling. As Carl Perkins, George Thorogood, and others have sung:

Well, I walked up to the window
And I said gimme a ticket please
She said where to mister
I said that's alright by me
I'm just restless
I got to get on out of town ...

Run this greyhound far as it will go
Drop this country boy a little farther down the road
I'm just restless
I got to get on out of town ...

Continuing with the big grey dog metaphor, I feel like I have to get on down the road a piece. Not that I am going to abandon my hometown, The Landscapist (remember, it's a meteaphor). I plan to keep on keeping on with that, but, as luck / fate / karma would have it, I have received an offer to be a beta member / tester of a new print on demand magazine service. I find this to be a very exciting prospect.

Part of the reason that I am restless, re: blogging, is that it is such a virtual thing - hey, if SquareSpace has a server, software, virus seizure, just like the turkey in A Christmas Story, it's gone, all gone. Then there's the fact that photographs are best viewed as printed pieces, not as virtual representations on a computer monitor where they all tend to look (a)like ... well ... a picture on a computer monitor.

The other "problem" with blogging is that on The Landscapist - and many other photo blogs as well - there is a wealth of valuable stuff buried in "archives" (past entries) that, for the most part, might just as well be buried six feet under for all the viewing that they get. I mean, I save lots of photo pubs, not to mention my photo book collection, that I revisit and savor over and over like old friends. Can't say I've ever done that on a photo blog, The Landscapist included.

No, the web is far less than it's cracked up to be in so many ways. It's great for a "quick fix" but has very little to offer in the way of "longevity". My rule of thumb for "savor", for "longevity", for "satisfaction" is rather simple - if I can't lay in bed or sit on the can with it, it's just a passing fancy kind of thing.

So, get ready for The Landscapist, the magazine.

That said, I am putting out a call for portfolios (of the virtual kind) for review. I would appreciate it if those of you with photo blogs would link to this entry on your blog in order to get the request for portfolios out there as wide-spread as possible. I am not looking for bleeding edge, next big thing stuff - that's OK if you've got it, but I am much more interested in work that is ... well ... kind of "quiet" and low-key. I am growing weary of pretentious, deliberately "arty" pictures.

BTW, all manner and genre of work is accepted - landscape, street, people, nature, still life, bw/color, "straight", "staged", etc.

I am also putting out a call for writing contributors - regular or occasional. I know this is an intimidating prospect for many but I'm not looking for academic treatise or mind-shattering / groundbreaking thoughts and ideas. Simple thoughts, notions, and ideas about photography from a personal perspective is what I'd like. As a matter of fact, simple writing that is free of camera-club speak and as anti- academic lunatic fringe as possible.

FYI, the magazine will probably be a quarterly publication, or, depending upon the number of submissions, whenever there is enough to say. The emphasis will be on pictures, not words - think LensWork (download a pdf sample) but with even fewer words.

If this is to work, I need your help even if it is in just a "small" way.

Tuesday
Jun102008

picture window # 13 ~ it's still hot and humid

bdrmfansm.jpg1044757-1635515-thumbnail.jpg
trying to keep it cool-ishclick to embiggen
Ok, it's not NYC hot and humid, but, everything is relative, is it not?

FYI, this picture is essentially the same view as this picture - the picture that launched the picture window series.

As I have been pursuing this project, and as I mentioned yesterday, an idea for another series came to mind - a kind of picture windows II. While I have been picturing from the inside out, it has occurred to me that picturing from the outside in would be very interesting indeed.

To date, my picture window pictures have been made in places in which I found myself by invitation or work - places of friends and associates, as well as my own home. While continuing on this path, my next step is to knock on the doors of strangers, explain myself and my project, and ask to picture one (or more) of their windows. I don't anticipate too much of a problem with this approach.

I am not as certain that asking strangers to be allowed to picture into their homes would be as well received. On the hand, I think it would be well worth effort to find those who would allow it, especially if they would also agree to be in the pictures.