counter customizable free hit
About This Website

This blog is intended to showcase my pictures or those of other photographers who have moved beyond the pretty picture and for whom photography is more than entertainment - photography that aims at being true, not at being beautiful because what is true is most often beautiful..

>>>> Comments, commentary and lively discussions, re: my writings or any topic germane to the medium and its apparatus, are vigorously encouraged.

Search this site
Recent Topics
Journal Categories
Archives by Month
Subscribe
listed

Photography Directory by PhotoLinks

Powered by Squarespace
Login

BODIES OF WORK ~ PICTURE GALLERIES

  • my new GALLERIES WEBSITE
    ADK PLACES TO SIT / LIFE WITHOUT THE APA / RAIN / THE FORKS / EARLY WORK / TANGLES

BODIES OF WORK ~ BOOK LINKS

In Situ ~ la, la, how the life goes onLife without the APADoorsKitchen SinkRain2014 • Year in ReviewPlace To SitART ~ conveys / transports / reflectsDecay & DisgustSingle WomenPicture WindowsTangles ~ fields of visual energy (10 picture preview) • The Light + BW mini-galleryKitchen Life (gallery) • The Forks ~ there's no place like home (gallery)


Entries in picture windows (60)

Friday
May282010

picture window # 48 ~ it was a sunny day

1044757-7116751-thumbnail.jpg
Doctor's exam room / playground ~ in the Adirondack PARK - Au Sable Forks, NY • click to embiggen
IMO, one of the greatest books ever written, re: art, is The Art Spirit by the teacher/artist Robert Henri. If I had to summarize Henri's theme it would be this -

Artist, know thyself, or, be actively engaged in getting to know thyself. From knowing thyself will come the idea(s) from which your voice/vision will spring. And it is the idea that will drive the invention of all you need to know (technique) to express it.

Henri repeatedly warns against placing the acquisition of technique and tools ahead of the fostering of ideas. I agree and that is why I so vigorously disparage - if one is interested in making interesting pictures - the gear-oriented approach to picture making.

That is also why I will require attendees to my Picturing Making Chautauqua to limit themselves and their picture making activities to a single lens, preferably a single fixed focal length lens. If they only have a zoom lens, I will supply all the black electrical tape needed to secure the zoom control to a single focal length.

Thursday
May202010

picture window # 47 ~ nice view

1044757-7010167-thumbnail.jpg
Dancing Bears window ~ in the Adirondack PARK - Lake Placid, NY • click to embiggen
Last evening during dinner at the Dancing Bears Lounge in Lake Placid.

Monday
Mar012010

picture windows # 46 ~ snowstorm 

1044757-5957786-thumbnail.jpg
Collette Blanchard Gallery ~ SoHo - NY, NY • click to embiggen
What with my attention focused elsewhere, picture making series-wise, I have been neglecting my picture window series. That oversight has not been intentional as much as it has kinda been a case of too-many-pictures, too-little-time.

Maybe I need to make some post-it reminders that I can tack on my cameras - one for each of my ongoing series.

Thursday
Oct012009

tuscany # 45 ~ a picture window

1044757-4312879-thumbnail.jpg
Window in the summer villa of Pope Pius II ~ Pienza, Tuscanyclick to embiggen

Tuesday
Sep222009

(Tuscan style) picture window # 22 ~ window light

1044757-4223291-thumbnail.jpg
il Bacio windowclick to embiggen
Once again, no matter where you go, there you are.

As with yesterday's Tuscan-style decay picture, there were also numerous picture window picturing opportunities in Tuscany.

Wednesday
May272009

picture window # 21 ~ how sharp is a rat's ass?

1044757-3197107-thumbnail.jpg
Round window at the Binghamton Regency Hotelclick to embiggen
Now that the 7800 is up and printing, one "issue" with which I have been struggling ... well, not exactly struggling - more like contemplating and experimenting with - is the uniquely digital domain notion of sharpness. Or, perhaps a bit more accurately, the notion of sharpening.

One of the characteristics of digital image capture and subsequent processing is the fact that sharpness is a very fungible construct. No longer is a picture's sharpness determined solely by optics and film choice - both of which are predetermined by someone other than the picture maker. The only choice a picture maker has in the analog picture world is that of which film / optics (camera and enlarger) to use.

In the digital world there are a zillion options that determine "final" sharpness- everything from a wide variety of sharpening techniques to a host of sharpening software choices, which, in turn, have a host of sharpening techniques. With the exception of the in-camera anti-alias filter, it's up to the picture maker to decide how sharp he/she wants a picture to be.

As seems inevitable in the digital domain, the idea of sharpness has been taken to fetishistic extremes. The pixel peepers in the crowd are positively obsessed with sharpness at the most extreme levels of magnification - truly nose-on-print viewing distances. Viewing distances that have absolutely nothing to do with the practical practice of looking at pictures.

However, from my long and varied experience, it is quite obvious that, with the exception of a very noticeable lack of sharpness in a print (bad focus, camera movement, etc.), the picture viewing public doesn't really give a rat's ass about sharpness. And that includes even the viewing public typically found in the rare-air Art World photo galleries and museums.

Simply put, given a decent level of sharpness - which would be judged by many picture makers to be unacceptably low - the viewing public is much more interested in a picture's content and meaning than they are in its technical merit.

That is why I have a rather cavalier attitude when it comes to the technique of sharpening. I don't own or plan to own stand-alone or plug-in sharpening software. I do apply sharpening in my RAW conversion processing and as a final step in PS processing (always on the Lightness Channel in LAB color space) but I tend to apply it so the final result resembles that of the look of film sharpness rather than that of digital sharpness.

Film sharpness that, by digital sharpness standards, would be considered rather "soft". However, because I view my prints as a member of the viewing public, my prints look much better than fine ... but that's because I am more concerned with the big picture (literally and figuratively).

How about you? How do you look at/view sharpness?

Friday
Jan022009

picture window # 20 ~ buy this book

1044757-2317743-thumbnail.jpg
The Cinemascapist looking out of a picture windowclick to embiggen
Playing Santa Claus to myself, I purchased a new book of photography while I was in south Jersey.

Whenever I am in a "big" city / suburban sprawl area, I generally like to find a bookstore (is there anything other than a Borders / Barnes & Noble out there?) and browse the photography section, both books and periodicals. Although I must say that, lately, all the periodical racks offer is almost exclusively made up of gear / how-to / pretty picture crap.

The book sections are marginally better and occasionally one can find an unexpected and unheard of surprise lurking amongst the shelves full of How To Master Landscape Photography dreck and drivel. One such delightful discovery is now in my collection - River of No Return ~ Photography by Laura McPhee. Check out the "Book Tease" HERE.

I had never heard of Laura McPhee prior to stumbling upon this book. When I saw the spine of the book on the shelf I was immediately drawn to the name McPhee (which stood alone without her first name) because one of my all-time favorite authors is John McPhee, who, as it turns out, is her father. Her mother is Pryde Brown - a wedding / portrait / event photographer in Princeton, NJ.

So much for introductions and on to the book. As I mentioned, I picked the book up because of the name McPhee and, even though upon viewing the cover I discovered it was not John McPhee, I flipped through the book and saw enough interesting-at-first-glance pictures to pique my interest. After spending a few more minutes with it, the book went into my basket simply because my quick look at the pictures imparted a sense that the photographer was giving me a real look at a place that went beyond the regular landscape genré.

Another purely visual sense led me to want the book - the feeling that the pictures were made using a large format camera and color negative film. Later reading confirmed this suspicion to be the case - indeed, an 8×10 view camera and color negative film are Laura McPhee's tools of choice. An aside - if you haven't had the pleasure of viewing prints made from LF color negatives you should go any distance / make any effort to do so because you'll never realize that, no matter how much the digital gearheads rave about their state-of-the-art equipment, it can not hold a candle to the color and tonal subtlety of 8×10 color negative film.

That said, I have not been disappointed in this book. As a matter of fact, I would rank it very high (if not at the top) of my list of must-haves for the serious picture maker. I would do so because this book is:

1) a magnificently "complete" look at a place - McPhee mixes photo genrés - traditional landscape, portraiture, and a form of documentary and of still life - to great story-telling effect. It most definitely reads as an all-of-a-piece, sum-is-greater-than-its-parts work in and of itself -

This book of seventy-two images is itself a work of art: It accumulates meanings through echo, repetition, statement and counter-statement, digression, and return ... on the second or third time through it began to dawn on me what Laira McPhee was up to, to see that River of No return is organized like a long poem or a piece of music, that it is, as well as a stunning look at an actual place, a meditation on rivers, nature, history, the history of landscape photography of the American West and of the idea of the American West. And - while I'm piling theme upon theme - the nature of fact and the nature of myth, and how we hold the world in our hands. ~ from the Foreword by Robert Hass

Most certainly the book has quite a number of stand-alone greatest-hits type pictures, but if you have ever wondered what a cohesive body of work looks like, a body of work which demonstrates the relative "weakness" of single stand-alone pictures, this book is for you. On that criteria alone, this book is well worth the modest price of admission.

2) beyond the aforementioned, the other reason to rank this book high on the must-have list is because of the writing that accompanies the pictures - not as captions or stories, but in the form of an introduction, an essay, and an interview with McPhee (each by different writers).

What all these words convey are ideas and notions, thoughts and conversations, about meaning and process. Not only of the work itself but also, by extrapolation, a kind of working thesis on picturing making as Art (of any kind). In a very real sense, for the thinking person, there is enough of real substance here to chew on that one could almost consider it a bargain basement, $37.42 tuition fee for a MFA degree in photography.

All the writing is the product of the much dreaded photography academia (as are the pictures themselves - McPhee is a professor of photography at the Massachusetts College of Art and Design). What is amazing to me is the almost total absence of any vestige of the web of verbal and theoretical delirium that is so often spun by the academic lunatic fringe. The writings and interview are eminently readable and understandable.

IMO, this book is very highly recommended.

Wednesday
Dec312008

picture window # 19 ~ the long view

1044757-2311682-thumbnail.jpg
Noel and narcissusclick to embiggen
Another year has come and gone. As the holidays come to a close and another Gregorian-calender year begins, I would like to wish all of you a happy new year.

I can't help but think that 2009 is going to be a very interesting year.

Page 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... 8 Next 8 Entries »